header-logo header-logo

New child maintenance rules may neglect single parents

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Government seeking to reduce burden on statutory schemes

Rules aimed at eradicating child poverty and providing a cost effective service for the taxpayer may lead to single parent families missing out.

Rules regarding child maintenance, which encourage ex-couples to reach their own arrangements voluntarily, came into force this week. Those that fail to reach an agreement are to face action from the newly instigated Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC).

Janet Paraskeva, chairman of the CMEC, says: “We need to put the interests of children first and disconnecting maintenance payments from the benefits system is an important step forward.”

However, Richard Bebb, a partner at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says there is concern that single parent families who are unable to make their own arrangements may miss out altogether. There will certainly be parents that would prefer to be treated responsibly, and not be forced to use a state scheme...for unlucky single parents who cannot reach agreement, and who might not claim benefits within a voluntary system, their children may be the biggest losers in the government’s new strategy to tackle child poverty,” he says.

Bebb says that despite assurances from the CMEC that nobody will be forced to opt out of the statutory service and that it will remain available for those unable to reach private arrangements, research conducted by family charities found that up to 24% of lone parents within a voluntary system may go without child maintenance. “It seems clear that the government is trying to reduce the burden on the statutory scheme and thereby render it more effective than the Child Support Agency has been. However, single parents in receipt of benefits could be seen as a soft target because any maintenance received is simply deducted from benefits,” he adds.
 

Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll