header-logo header-logo

05 February 2015
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Neuberger on costs

President of Supreme Court calls for fixed costs

The introduction of fixed costs for small multi-track cases such as low-level building disputes could be a way to achieve proportionate costs, according to Lord Neuberger.

In an address to the Manchester Law Society and Northern Circuit Commercial Bar Association, Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, said costs management would take time to “bed down” but that, if it did not work, there would be no alternative but to go over to fixed costs.

“Particularly bearing in mind the government’s fundamental duty to enable access to justice and their swingeing cuts in civil legal aid, it is more than disappointing that after all this time, we still do not have fixed costs for all fast track cases. Indeed, I would hope that fixed costs might be extended to the smaller multi-track cases,” he said.

He also touched on the increase in specialist judges, and called for this development not to go “too far”.

“The law is already at risk of developing in silos, and a not-too-specialist judiciary has a great deal to offer in ensuring that there is cross-fertilisation between the silos,” he said.

Online dispute resolution (ODR), which the Civil Justice Council is currently producing a report into, could also provide a quick way of resolving small disputes and perhaps, eventually, substantial cases, he said.

Lord Neuberger also took aim at politicians who criticise judges, while delivering the FA Mann Lecture last week. Increased judicial openness has led to a “concomitant increase in the risk of inappropriate attacks on judges”, he said. “Judges cannot and should not be expected to defend their judgments” therefore attacks by ministers and MPs are “constitutionally inappropriate”.

Issue: 7639 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll