header-logo header-logo

Neuberger calls for Brexit clarity

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Judges need more clarity about how to apply post-Brexit decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), Lord Neuberger has said.

After Brexit, historic judgments of the ECJ will retain the same binding status in UK courts, under the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the Repeal Bill). However, the extent to which courts must take new judgments into account is not clear.

In an interview with the BBC this week, Lord Neuberger, who retires next month from the role of President of the Supreme Court, said judges should not be blamed for any misinterpretation if the position is not made clear.

Lord Neuberger said all judges ‘would hope and expect Parliament to spell out how the judges would approach that sort of issue after Brexit, and to spell it out in a statute.

Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll