header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Negligence after Meadows & Manchester

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
23 September 2022 / Wendy Laws
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Personal injury , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail
94715
Dr Wendy Laws provides an invaluable guide to interpreting negligence cases
  • The Supreme Court in Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK and Meadows v Khan set down six framework questions for analysing claims in negligence.
  • Do those questions represent a novel freestanding framework, or can they be integrated with a more conventional approach, to form a coherent overall structure for the analysis of claims in negligence?

In this article I ask how we should understand the structure of a claim in negligence after the decisions in: Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021] UKSC 20, [2021] UKSC 20, [2021] 4 All ER 1 and Meadows v Khan [2021] UKSC 21, [2021] 4 All ER 65.

The Supreme Court set down six framework questions for analysing claims in negligence—but do those questions represent a novel freestanding framework, or can they be integrated with a more conventional approach to form a coherent overall structure for the analysis of claims in negligence?

Manchester/Meadows concerned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Tax shock ahead for partners?
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll