header-logo header-logo

02 April 2024
Categories: Legal News , Non disclosure agreements
printer mail-detail

NDA legislation promised as Chalk cracks down on gagging orders

Legislation will be introduced to reform Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) ‘as soon as parliamentary time allows’, ministers have confirmed

In an announcement last week, the Lord Chancellor, Alex Chalk KC said the changes would clarify that NDAs cannot be legally enforced if they prevent victims from reporting a crime. The legislation will ensure information relating to criminal conduct can be discussed without fear of legal action with police, crime investigation or prosecution bodies, lawyers and support services such as counsellors, advocacy services, or medical professionals, which operate under clear confidentiality principles.

Chalk said NDAs ‘are too often used to sweep criminality under the carpet and prevent victims from accessing the advice and support they need’.

Provisions in NDAs relating to commercially sensitive information or other obligations not relevant to criminal conduct will retain their legal effects.

Chair of the Bar Council, Sam Townend KC, said: ‘The issue of NDAs is ripe for legislative change.

‘Some NDAs are abusive in nature. NDAs can't cover criminal acts and under existing common law protections many are already unenforceable but those who are asked to sign them are not always aware of the relevant legal principles and may not have timely access to legal advice.

‘Legislative change should aim to put these matters beyond doubt. Getting the wording and definitions right will be important and we look forward to working with the government and others on this.’

Earlier this month, a Legal Services Board (LSB) summary report, ‘The misuse of NDAs: call for evidence themes and summary of evidence’, found evidence of NDAs being used to cover up illegal conduct and promote imbalances of power. The report included responses from 74 individuals with personal experience including imbalances of power such as employer/employee, divorce and consumer disputes, access to justice issues and a lack of understanding about legal rights. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll