header-logo header-logo

24 February 2020
Issue: 7876 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NCDV steps up assistance for domestic abuse victims

The National Centre for Domestic Violence (NCDV) helped a record 3,000 victims pro bono to apply to courts for non-molestation orders in 2019

The number is a leap from the 2,000 victims NCDV helped in 2018. The team, based in Guildford, has 45 members and helps callers from all over England, irrespective of their financial circumstances. It aims to get effective legal protection in place for them in as little as 24 hours.

Mark Groves, NCDV chief executive, said: ‘We make no charge whatsoever to the victims who call us. We’re here to help those who cannot afford a solicitor get legal aid funding urgently so that they can apply for and get proper legal protection in place. 

‘If some victims don’t qualify for legal aid but still cannot afford a solicitor that is when we can step in and help them pro bono―typically using our experience to help them appear as a litigant in person.’

Groves said the increase reflected rising public awareness of domestic violence and abuse, partly due to public campaigns such as NCDV’s World Cup initiative in July 2018. The organisation receives about 7,000 calls each month from people who are either suffering or at risk. Most of the callers are women who have been referred by the police.

‘Our service in helping victims secure non-molestation orders is one of the most effective counters to domestic violence because if abusers breach an NMO it is a criminal offence punishable by up to five years in prison,’ Groves said. However, many callers are in financial as well as domestic distress, and while some are able to secure legal aid funding, others can’t. Groves said one victim was asked to make a personal contribution of £45,000.

NCDV was founded in 2002 as the London Centre for Domestic Violence by ex-barrister and policeman, Dr Steve Connor. It has trained more than 8,000 police officers on how to counter domestic violence and abuse, and launched pioneering database systems.

Issue: 7876 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll