header-logo header-logo

18 April 2025 / Diane Dickson
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Features , ESG , Environment , Commercial , Construction
printer mail-detail

Navigating the path to net zero

216127
Diane Dickson examines the legal framework for green building, explaining the latest changes & their impact on practitioners & clients
  • The legal framework for green building is dynamic. Significant changes, such as the Carbon Emissions (Buildings) Bill, are on the horizon.
  • Practitioners must guide clients through complex obligations, from biodiversity net gain to whole-life carbon accounting.
  • Future-proofing strategies are essential to meet stricter standards such as the 2025 Future Homes Standard.

Green building refers to the adoption of environmentally sustainable materials, technologies and construction methods aimed at reducing carbon emissions and minimising environmental impact throughout a building’s lifecycle, including its design, construction, operation and refurbishment phases. Over the past decade, green building has evolved from an industry buzzword to a cornerstone of the UK’s climate strategy. With a legally binding commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050, the construction sector plays a critical role in addressing the environmental and societal impacts of climate change.

However, achieving this vision demands more than technological advances or aesthetic shifts;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll