header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Financial services litigation , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NatWest case means no bank ‘too big’

Bank to face money laundering accusations in court

Money laundering action launched against NatWest will send ‘shockwaves’ through the financial sector, a senior criminal lawyer has said.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced this week it has begun criminal proceedings against National Westminster Bank Plc (NatWest) in respect of offences under the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (MLR).

It is the FCA’s first criminal prosecution under the MLR and the first under the regulations to be brought against a bank.

The allegations relate to failings to determine, conduct and demonstrate due diligence and ongoing monitoring of relationships with customers to prevent money laundering between 11 November 2011 and 19 October 2016.

The FCA alleges about £365m was paid into a UK incorporated customer’s accounts, of which about £264m was in cash. Natwest is scheduled to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 14 April. No individuals are being charged under the proceedings.

Claire Cross, a partner at Corker Binning specialising in white collar fraud, said: ‘Despite Mark Steward, the FCA’s head of enforcement, stating back in 2018 that the regulator had commenced a small number of investigations to ascertain whether there had been any misconduct in the industry that might justify a prosecution under the MLR, up until today the general consensus was that a criminal case would be unlikely to be forth coming. 

‘This was partly due to the fact that the FCA had shut the majority of its criminal based investigations in this area and partly due to the amount of time that had passed since the original announcement.’

Cross said the proceedings set ‘an important precedent―no-one is too big to escape the FCA’s criminal net.

‘Mark Steward claimed in 2019 that he suspected that criminal cases rather than civil or regulatory action would be “exceptional” but he was also keen that the prosecution powers should not be a “white elephant”.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll