header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Naming and shaming complaints plan attacked

In Brief

The Legal Complaints Service’s proposals to publish solicitor complaints records has drawn bitter criticism from the Law Society. In its response to the LCS consultation— Exploring the Publication of Solicitors Complaints Records—the society says the move will mislead clients and unfairly penalise solicitors who give good client care. Society chief executive Des Hudson claims the LCS’s preferred option is a mistake that will rebound to the disadvantage of the public.

He says: “The society agrees it is important that clients should have meaningful information to help them choose a solicitor who is right for their legal problem and situation. But we do not believe the LCS’s proposals are likely to achieve this. Indeed, they may well mislead clients away from competent solicitors.” Hudson says the society favours helping solicitors to deal well with clients and plans to devote “significant resources” to enhance client service across the profession.

“We are giving solicitors real tools which demonstrate good practice and provide them with training. This is more likely to achieve good service to clients than what looks like a crude exercise in naming and shaming,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll