header-logo header-logo

05 December 2018 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

The myth that Article 50 is a one-way street

David Wolchover explains exactly why Article 50 can be unilaterally rescinded

With the predicted failure of the government to get its Brexit deal through the Commons, the Labour leadership is said to be aiming to initiate a general election via a no confidence vote with plan B, a second People’s Vote incorporating a no-Brexit option. Let us suppose that this time the choice is remain.

Or, indulging in a bit of make-believe, suppose after the debate a Commons majority writes off Brexit altogether as a car crash waiting to happen. In reaching that conclusion, they harness the grave breaches of electoral law and information regulations committed by Leave campaigners as wiping out the legitimacy of the wafer-thin Leave vote. Perhaps it even dawns on some of our less numerate legislators—finally—that to describe the Leave vote by 37% of the registered electorate as expressing the will of the people is an arithmetic absurdity, a mathematical monstrosity.

Since well before the prime minister activated Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll