header-logo header-logo

M&S PROFILE: Vicki Strachan

27 January 2016
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail
vicky_strachan_0

The Wynne-Jones partner relishes her new challenge as head of training

Vicki Strachan has recently joined the partnership of IP firm Wynne-Jones.

What was your route into the profession? 
I did a degree in electrical and electronic engineering, but it soon became clear that I would not be happy in a hands-on engineering role. I took a post with the UK Intellectual Property Office as an examiner and became fascinated by the law, but wanted to pursue a more commercial role in the longer term. A trainee post came up locally when I had been an examiner for just under two years, and the rest is history…

What has been your biggest career challenge so far? 
There have been lots of challenges, some good, some not so good. I think my greatest challenge will be in my current role as head of training for Wynne-Jones IP. I have been charged with setting up and running the Wynne-Jones Training Academy and currently have three trainees in my care. It is so important to me to ensure that they have a good experience of the training process and remain excited and passionate about Wynne-Jones and the profession as a whole, even though the first couple of years, especially, can be hard (I remember).  Standards of training vary greatly across the profession and I hope we will eventually become a centre of excellence in that regard. 

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?
I won’t name anyone, but I was trained by two true gentlemen, and I am always inspired by people who can flourish in a commercial world without losing sight of their core human values.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?
I would be a teacher. I have a post-graduate certificate of education and spent a couple of happy years lecturing at Gloucestershire College.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?
I used to love watching Ally McBeal.   

What change would you make to the profession?
The profession has already changed from when I joined it in 1994, and continues to do so. It is certainly becoming more inclusive. I would like to see patent law and practice made much more uniform across the world, which would ultimately benefit businesses and entrepreneurs greatly in terms of cost and time to secure worldwide patent protection. But I don’t expect that to happen in my lifetime!

How do you relax?
Nothing makes me happier than spending quality time with my family—I wouldn’t call it relaxing (we have four children and a grandchild), but it is always fun.

Issue: 7683 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll