header-logo header-logo

28 February 2017
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M&S PROFILE: Bryan Scant

bryan_scant.jld_chair

The new chair of the JLD of the Law Society calls for no-fault divorce

Bryan Scant is a 3 year PQE solicitor based on the south coast and specialising in private family work. He trained with a High Street firm in Poole, Dorset, before moving to work for a legal 200 firm based in Bournemouth specialising in high value matrimonial cases and disputes involving children. He is the 2017 Chair of the Junior Lawyers Division of the Law Society (JLD) which represents approximately 70,000 members from LPC students to solicitors of up to 5 years PQE.   

What was your route into the profession?

After completing my A-Levels I read law at Bournemouth University from 2006–2010, which included a placement year in a local firm of solicitors. When I had completed my LPC in London I returned to Bournemouth after accepting an offer of a training contract with the firm I worked for during my placement. 

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Qualifying into family law at a time when there were substantial cuts to legal aid and the effects of the recession were still being felt. The leap from trainee to NQ was also a substantial challenge—going from working on cases with a supervisor to suddenly running a case load independently was a steep learning curve!

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

There isn’t one person in particular. I admire solicitors who have worked their way up through the profession to become senior members of the judiciary, roles that have traditionally been held by barristers. 

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career? 

History teacher.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer? 

Any John Grisham lawyer.

What change would you make to the profession?

No-fault divorce.

How do you relax?

Unwinding with friends or walking along Bournemouth beach.

Issue: 7738 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll