header-logo header-logo

18 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

MPs give verdict on Covid laws

Parliament was not given sufficient opportunity to scrutinise and amend emergency pandemic laws, a cross-party committee of MPs has concluded

The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee published its report, ‘Coronavirus Act 2020 two years on’ this week, criticising the ‘take it or leave it’ nature of the sunset clause for six-monthly votes on the Act, where MPs were unable to object to individual elements of the legislation. It criticised the government for issuing guidance which overruled legislation.

In its conclusions, the committee stated: ‘Any future use of sunset clauses in relation to emergency legislation should come with a clear explanation about why the government believes that the length of the sunset being proposed is proportionate to the emergency being addressed.’

Looking ahead to future emergencies, it said: ‘The committee calls on the government to carefully consider the use of guidance in future emergencies to ensure maximum clarity and minimal complexity for the public and law enforcement.

‘The government should ensure that future legislation of this type doesn’t allow for the ability to use guidance to overrule key elements of legislation, as this leads to confusion.’

The MPs also called for on the government to publish a timetable for the UK COVID-19 inquiry, stressing it must be done in a ‘thorough and timely manner’ while ‘the experiences of the pandemic and the government’s response are fresh in the mind and to avoid institutional knowledge being lost’.

Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll