header-logo header-logo

30 September 2014
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Motor insurance premiums warning

Recent case law suggests motor insurers could raise premiums despite new measures announced by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), a solicitor has warned.

The new measures, drawn up after a two-year investigation by the CMA into the private car insurance market, are designed to increase competition.

However, solicitor Nicholas Bevan, who has campaigned for better protection for road users, says the measures are likely to be eclipsed as the impact of the recent European Court of Justice ruling in Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav C-162/13 is felt.

In Vnuk , the court found that compulsory motor insurance must cover any accident occurring in the use of a vehicle that is “consistent with the normal function” of that vehicle, including cars driven on private property.

Bevan says the UK government can no longer ignore the fact that its national law provision breaches the minimum standards of compensatory protection and cover required under the European Directives on motor insurance.

“The UK will have to legislate to require insurers to guarantee third party cover for any use made of an insured vehicle – subject to rare exceptions. This will come at a price – the insurers are bound to argue that this will necessitate an increase in premiums,” Bevan adds.

The CMA investigation also came under fire for failing to resolve the issue of replacement cars. Its investigations highlighted that at-fault insurers pay “significantly” more for temporary replacement cars than the actual cost of providing this service, but concluded there was no “effective and proportionate” remedy.

Nigel Teasdale, of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers, described this as “disappointing to say the least”.

Issue: 7624 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll