header-logo header-logo

Motor insurance impact of Vnuk

09 September 2014
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cars driven solely on private property may need to be insured in future and all motor insurance policies amended following a recent decision by the European Court of Justice, according to a specialist in motor insurance law.

Ruling in Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav C-162/13, the court found that compulsory motor insurance has to cover any accident caused in the use of a vehicle that is “consistent with the normal function” of that vehicle. The case involved an accident where Mr Vnuk fell off a ladder hit by a tractor and trailer during the stacking of hay bales in a barn. He sought compensation from the tractor’s insurers, but his case initially failed because the Slovenian courts found the insurance did not cover the tractor’s use when manoeuvring a trailer into position in a farm yard.

However, the European Court found that the concept of “vehicle” within the meaning of the European Directive on motor insurance (72/166/EEC) bore no relation to its use and noted, further, that the tractor in this case was reversing which seemed to be consistent with its normal function.

Solicitor Nicholas Bevan, a personal injury lawyer who has campaigned for better protection of victims of uninsured drivers, said the judgment will require the Road Traffic Act 1988 to be amended and it will affect the scope of compulsory third party cover and that of the Uninsured and Untraced Drivers Agreements.  

On the geographical scope of the duty to insure, Bevan said the court’s interpretation was wider than that of UK law, which requires vehicles to be insured only if they are on “a road or other public place”. He said the court’s interpretation extended to any place, including the farmyard in Vnuck, which means “all those UK cases that differentiate between private property and land to which the public have access are out of date”. “While the [transport] minister’s nightmare about lawnmowers has not been realised it will be difficult to argue that an off-road scrambler’s use on a public highway is not a normal function”.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll