header-logo header-logo

More women judges please

02 July 2014
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A diverse judiciary would benefit both the courts and society, the UK’s only female justice of the Supreme Court has said.

Giving the Fiona Woolf Lecture last week at the Law Society’s Women Lawyers’ Division, Lady Hale said the principal reason for diversity in the judiciary is “democratic legitimacy…the judiciary should reflect the whole community”.

Women account for about a quarter of judges overall, while 21 out of 107 High Court judges, and seven out of 43 Lord Justices of Appeal and Heads of Division are women. Among the men Supreme Court justices, all but two went to boys’ boarding school, Oxbridge and the Inns of Court.

Non-standard candidates are disadvantaged at various stages along the way, Lady Hale said, for example, students from independent schools are more likely to go to Oxbridge regardless of their exam grades. 

She advocated widening recruitment to the legal profession, actively supporting able but unusual candidates to apply, and creating a proper judicial career structure.

 

Issue: 7613 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll