header-logo header-logo

More than skin deep?

26 January 2012 / Hugh Koch
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Expert Witness , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-detail

The psychological turmoil of breast implant removal & retention, by Hugh Koch Associates

Women with breast implants made by the French manufacturers Poly Implant Prosthèse (PIP) are commencing litigation in the UK. Anxiety levels have been raised by the French government with the recommendation that these implants are removed and key discussions are taking place as to the appropriate defendants in these cases (eg manufacturer, clinics, clinicians, hospital).

Many women with PIP implants will understandably be worried about the possible implications for their physical and emotional health. These factors need to be addressed with understanding and compassion by those responsible for their treatment and care. Where litigation is sensibly entered into, the initial focus would commonly be the physical consequences of the implant and its removal. However, it is important that the psychological side of implant removal (or lack of it) is also considered appropriately, both in terms of assessment and treatment.
A duty of care exists towards those who have sought breast implant surgery and now face the need for
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll