header-logo header-logo

17 July 2015 / Ruth Hewitt
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

More than a bystander?

nlj_7661_hewitt

Ruth Hewitt provides an update on how & when secondary victims can run successful compensation claims

“Secondary victims” are those people who are not at risk of physical injury because of the defendant’s negligence, but do suffer a psychiatric injury as a result of witnessing the injury of a loved one. Alcock & others v The Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1992) AC 310 is the leading case, arising out of the Hillsborough disaster. This case set out what a claimant must prove to recover compensation as a secondary victim:

  • A close tie of love and affection with the primary victim;
  • close proximity to the incident in time and place;
  • perception of the event or its aftermath; and
  • that the psychiatric illness that had been followed had been induced by the event.

When judgment was delivered in Alcock , it was only the third time that “nervous shock” had been considered by the House of Lords. It was acknowledged that this was because the number of cases brought by secondary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll