header-logo header-logo

MoJ will evaluate remote hearings

25 November 2020
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
‘Substantial investment’ being made into criminal court infrastructure
A formal, independent evaluation will be commissioned into the use of video hearings in criminal cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed in its response to the Justice Select Committee.

The MoJ is also planning a fully video remand pilot, building on knowledge gained during the pandemic, but this would be ‘subject to engagement and agreement with the judiciary’. It said ‘substantial investment’ was being made into criminal court infrastructure to support video hearings, with 50% of all courtrooms given video hearing facilities, and a second tranche of roll-put planned to increase this to 75%.

However, ministers have no intention of revisiting provision where court buildings have been closed.

In its report on the impact of coronavirus on courts and tribunals, in July (bit.ly/363twyj) the Committee said the government had been wrong to close so much of the court estate in the ten years prior to the pandemic, and warned the crisis should not be used to bring in permanent changes without proper consultation.

Responding this week to the Justice Committee report, the MoJ said: ‘As HM Courts and Tribunal Service recover from the impact of the coronavirus pandemic their focus will be on improving the existing estate through the additional funding received earlier this year and by making a robust case for additional funding as part of the spending review process.

‘Beyond the recent consultation on Medway County and Family Court, they have no further active proposals for changes to the court and tribunal estate.’

In response to other questions from the Committee, the MoJ said it was investigating the costs of setting up a freephone service for members of the public.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘Case backlogs are significant across both the civil and criminal justice systems.

‘To help clear the backlogs, we encourage the government to open additional Nightingale courts. Investing in legal aid for early advice and legal representation would help to nip problems in the bud, thus avoiding some cases going to court at all.’

While remote hearings have been successful, people needed to be physically present in some cases, particularly those involving vulnerable parties.

Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll