header-logo header-logo

MoJ will evaluate remote hearings

25 November 2020
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
‘Substantial investment’ being made into criminal court infrastructure
A formal, independent evaluation will be commissioned into the use of video hearings in criminal cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed in its response to the Justice Select Committee.

The MoJ is also planning a fully video remand pilot, building on knowledge gained during the pandemic, but this would be ‘subject to engagement and agreement with the judiciary’. It said ‘substantial investment’ was being made into criminal court infrastructure to support video hearings, with 50% of all courtrooms given video hearing facilities, and a second tranche of roll-put planned to increase this to 75%.

However, ministers have no intention of revisiting provision where court buildings have been closed.

In its report on the impact of coronavirus on courts and tribunals, in July (bit.ly/363twyj) the Committee said the government had been wrong to close so much of the court estate in the ten years prior to the pandemic, and warned the crisis should not be used to bring in permanent changes without proper consultation.

Responding this week to the Justice Committee report, the MoJ said: ‘As HM Courts and Tribunal Service recover from the impact of the coronavirus pandemic their focus will be on improving the existing estate through the additional funding received earlier this year and by making a robust case for additional funding as part of the spending review process.

‘Beyond the recent consultation on Medway County and Family Court, they have no further active proposals for changes to the court and tribunal estate.’

In response to other questions from the Committee, the MoJ said it was investigating the costs of setting up a freephone service for members of the public.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘Case backlogs are significant across both the civil and criminal justice systems.

‘To help clear the backlogs, we encourage the government to open additional Nightingale courts. Investing in legal aid for early advice and legal representation would help to nip problems in the bud, thus avoiding some cases going to court at all.’

While remote hearings have been successful, people needed to be physically present in some cases, particularly those involving vulnerable parties.

Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll