header-logo header-logo

06 October 2021
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Missing wills, fraudsters & the intestate

Wills are being left undiscovered and individuals wrongly deemed to have died intestate due to cuts in will searches by Bona Vacantia, a leading probate researcher has warned

Danny Curran, founder of Finders International and chair, the International Association of Professional Probate Researchers (IAPPR) said bereaved families have been losing out on millions of pounds since the Bona Vacantia division of The Crown scrapped funding for searches where no next of kin is known.

He said the cut, which happened about five years ago, has never been publicly announced. However, he said his firm has acted in the past quarter on a record number of cases worth more than £10m, where potential beneficiaries believe a will exists. At the same time, Bona Vacantia is advertising about 40 unclaimed estates per week, without checking to see if a will exists first. Curran has also noticed a rise in wills appearing long after estates have seemingly been tied up.

He said potential beneficiaries were missing out, the deceased’s wishes were not being applied and there was a risk scam artists may be trying to fraudulently seize assets.

‘Valid wills do exist for, on average, one in every five cases currently being advertised as intestacies by the government,’ he said. 

‘The solution to this escalating problem is simple: If the Bona Vacantia division reverted to an inexpensive will search prior to advertising estates they would find many estates do indeed have valid wills and need not be advertised.’

Curran said: ‘It’s the overall waste of time of all parties involved from solicitors hired by councils to wind up estates, to heir hunters and ultimately let-down individuals or nominated beneficiaries which is the issue.’ He suggested all individuals, especially those without next of kin, be informed of the option to file their will with the Central Probate Registry, which would securely hold a will.

Issue: 7951 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll