header-logo header-logo

25 November 2020 / Bryan Clark , Tania Sourdin
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Mediation , International justice
printer mail-detail

Minority report? The Singapore Convention

32832
The Singapore Convention on Mediation: Bryan Clark & Tania Sourdin present a minority view
  • How the Singapore Convention works.
  • The need for the Singapore Convention.
  • Unintended negative consequences?
  • How best to help expedite and promote international commercial mediation?

The coming into force of the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (the Singapore Convention) on 20 September 2020 has been heralded far and wide. Commentators have lined up to extol the virtues of this new international instrument hailing it a game changer for international commercial mediation. Certainly, at present, international commercial mediation activity lags behind its use within many domestic jurisdictions. While there may be a range of reasons for this, it has been argued previously that the lack of a uniform enforcement mechanism for international mediated settlement agreements (IMSAs) akin to that which applies to arbitral awards under the New York Convention has stifled demand from would-be users. The Singapore Convention seeks to directly address these concerns. In this article, however,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll