header-logo header-logo

Ministry U-turn on immigration fees

01 December 2016
Issue: 7725 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice has dropped a 500% hike in immigration fees which it introduced last month, following opposition from lawyers.

In October, fees for appeals in the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal rose from £80 to £490 for a decision on papers, and from £140 to £800 for an oral hearing.

Last week, however, the MoJ said it was reversing the increase, with immediate effect. All those who have paid the new fee will be reimbursed. The MoJ said it will also review the role of fees in the Upper Tribunal and consult on new proposals for tribunal fees, including for immigration and asylum cases.

Justice minister Oliver Heald said: “We have listened to the representations that we received.”

Welcoming the announcement, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “These fee increases risked seriously restricting access to justice.”

However, she added: “There is still a great deal to be done to address the problems caused by other recent increases in court and tribunal fees and charges. As the Justice Select Committee reported earlier this year, we have seen a drop of almost 70% in the number of cases brought before employment tribunals, but no real change in success rates.”

Issue: 7725 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll