header-logo header-logo

Minimum income challenge fails

17 July 2014
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Court of Appeal has rejected a legal challenge against Home Office rules that British citizens must demonstrate an income of at least £18,600 per annum before they can sponsor a foreign spouse from outside the EEA.

Ruling unanimously in MM (Lebanon) & Ors v Home Secretary [2014] EWCA Civ 985, the court found the requirements were lawful.

Delivering the leading judgment, Lord Justice Aikens said: “The question is whether the fact that the new mininum income requirement (MIR) has the effect of treating different national, ethnic, racial or sexual groups differently has a legitimate aim and there is a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised.

“There can be no doubt that the aims of new MIR, viz to reduce the burden on the state and to encourage integration, are legitimate.”

Issue: 7615 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll