header-logo header-logo

Mesh litigation

27 July 2017
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hundreds of women who suffered medical complications as a result of surgical mesh implants are bringing a large-scale group action, co-ordinated by Wedlake Bell. Similar actions against manufacturer Johnson & Johnson have taken place in Scotland, the US and Australia. The implants, made of polypropylene, are used to treat pelvic organ prolapse, and are extremely difficult to remove. Complications complained of include chronic and life-altering pain, often preventing everyday activities such as walking and running. NHS Scotland suspended their use in 2014. Wedlake Bell is examining allegations that Johnson & Johnson failed properly to test the devices and played down the risk and high failure rate.

Issue: 7756 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll