header-logo header-logo

07 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mergers: is there safety in numbers?

Research illustrates rising trend for law firm mergers over past year

Mergers between law firms have soared 65% in the past year.

Some 385 mergers took place in 2013, up from 234 in 2012, according to accountants Wilkins Kennedy, as the legal sector consolidated to save on costs. Larger firms snapped up smaller players to make themselves more profitable and combat increased competition from other legal services, providers, the accountancy firm said.

For example, last year Norton Rose merged with US firm Fulbright & Jaworski in June; Wragge & Co merged with City firm Lawrence Graham in May; and Manches joined Penningtons in October, after Manches ran into difficulties. By comparison, there were just 146 mergers in the same 12-month period five years ago.

Tommy White, partner at Wilkins Kennedy, says: “These figures show that the rising trend for mergers shows no signs of slowing down, as financial pressures, increased competition, and to a perhaps lesser extent regulatory issues, are still having a major impact.

“M&A, corporate finance and property work for lawyers, particularly in the south of the country are all recovering but are generally still below the heady days of pre-2007. In addition the long term, secular decline in litigation work continues—despite a helping hand from recession linked disputes. While some firms need to find a white knight quickly in order to stave off potential financial collapse, others are turning to mergers to deliver that boost in profitability that a merger will achieve from cost savings. Economies of scale from a merger—especially where the merged firms can better utilise staffing levels—can be substantial.”

White says there has also been an increase in mergers aimed at gaining access to new sectors and services or to achieve wider exposure overseas. “The drive for consolidation appears to be more, not less, pressing as we leave recession behind,” he says.

Smaller firms, in particular, are under pressure from measures such as the ban on referral fees for personal injury cases, changes to legal aid and conditional fee arrangements as well as increased competition following the liberalisation of the legal services market, he adds.

Issue: 7618 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll