header-logo header-logo

20 October 2017
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Megatrends could pave way for unprecedented disruption

The march of US firms onto UK territory continues unabated, while UK firms face a double whammy of pressure on fees and rising staff costs, according to PwC’s latest annual Law Firms’ Survey.

In the past few years, US firms have poached senior partners and lawyers from UK firms, the survey notes. ‘These hires, coupled with leveraging the strength of their US business relationships (and in particular, US Private Equity houses), means these firms now represent formidable competition and are undoubtedly “here to stay”.

‘In addition to taking market share, their ability to pay partners without lock step restrictions and fee earner salaries a step beyond UK firms, means that traditional partner remuneration and staffing models are also being heavily disrupted.’

Meanwhile, UK firms face a series of challenges including clients’ changing demands and new technologies. At least 70% of Top 100 firms surveyed achieved fee income growth, but the average increase was only between 2.3% and 3.7%. Pricing remains an issue, with fixed fees now accounting for more than a quarter of work in Top 25 firms.

David Snell, PwC partner, UK legal sector leader, said: ‘Key drivers in the sector include significant consolidation in the market through mergers & acquisitions, greater international expansion, a wave of US firms penetrating the UK market and the impact of the Legal Services Act 2007.

‘Alongside this, “Megatrends” such as the rise in digital technology (including the potentially seismic shifting Artificial Intelligence), major changes in the geo-political landscape and social change are all leading to unprecedented levels of disruption.’

Snell said the most important factor for success was ‘clear and effective leadership’.

 
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll