header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011 / David Burrows
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Meet the new FPR!

Part one: David Burrows offers some preliminary thoughts on the Family Proceedings Rules 2010

At the tail end of last year—a good time to bury bad news—a new set of family proceedings rules, Family Proceedings Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), were laid before Parliament (SI 2010/2955). They are due to come into operation on 6 April 2011.

These rules have been anticipated since Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR 1998) hit the book stands in late 1998; and they have been in MoJ gestation for five years and more. The resources put into their delivery would be risible; save that they relate to a very important subject for those affected: children and some of the poorer members of society, who are now—in addition—likely to be without legal aid (to add legal aid insult to the injury of the convoluted new rules).

The committee which drafted these rules faced an almost insuperable task. They tried to comprise a substantial array of procedural, jurisdictional, case management and evidential facets to very diverse sets of family proceedings in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll