header-logo header-logo

Mediation: one size fits all?

28 February 2014 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
web_harrison_0

Richard Harrison addresses some fundamentals of the mediation process

The last redoubt of oratory and rhetoric in legal practice is now to be found in the opening plenary sessions of mediation.

The emotional appeal to the jury to give the poor defendant a chance is now firmly in the past. The magnificent cadences of final speeches in civil claims are rarely heard.

But a day’s mediation is traditionally commenced by a roundtable get-together where the spokesperson for each party gets the chance to put the case at its absolute highest and tell the other side about how dreadfully they have been advised by their own lawyers. This is one chance to wheel out the old advocacy skills.

I have therefore set out to produce a uniform “one size fits all” speech for the busy mediation participant who wants maximum effect from minimum effort. Some may say this is indeed empty rhetoric: I could not possibly comment. I follow it up with a template address from the mediator on the physiological challenges of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll