header-logo header-logo

A matter of interest

09 October 2015 / Lance M Dodgson
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Lance M Dodgson discusses recovering interest on special damages

Courts routinely award interest on special damages at eight per cent in personal injury matters despite case law advocating the adoption of the special account rate.

Given the inconsistent court practices, the appropriate award for interest can cause a number of difficulties for lawyers seeking to provide clear advice. In the current turbulent economic climate, interest can and does make a substantial difference to the amounts recovered on behalf of Claimants and must not be undervalued.

The inherent judicial power to award interest is contained in the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA 1981), s 35A, for High Court cases, and the County Court Act 1984 (CCA 1984), s 69, for county court cases. The SCA 1981 and CCA 1984 regrettably fail to provide any guidance on the rate and period concerning the award of interest. The courts however have a wide discretion to determine whether interest is to be awarded, the period of interest and the rate of interest. Case law states that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll