header-logo header-logo

Mass campaign against Mastercard

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-detail
Representatives for Walter Merricks’s £17bn ‘opt-out’ claim against Mastercard have launched the biggest public noticing campaign in legal history.

A £600,000 print and digital advertising campaign targeting national, regional and social media channels will inform consumers of their rights under the claim, with about 46 million people potentially eligible for a pay-out of up to £300 each. The campaign launched last week, following the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of Mastercard’s final challenge to certification of collective proceedings, in Mastercard v Merricks [2022] EWCA Civ 1568.

The case, which is based on interchange fees paid by businesses when consumers paid by card, is the first to be brought under the collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Everyone within the scope of the claim is automatically included unless they specifically opt out.

Former financial ombudsman Merricks said: ‘Even if you didn’t use a Mastercard and just paid for things by cash, cheque or a different card, you can still benefit from my claim.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll