header-logo header-logo

Market impact: what’s recoverable?

26 May 2023 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Features , Tort , Damages
printer mail-detail
123324
How can the courts determine the extent of economic loss due to financial downturns in a tort claim? Ian Gascoigne discusses the challenges of striking the right balance
  • In tort, a court’s task is to determine objectively the types of loss that would foreseeably be anticipated at the time that the breach of duty happened.
  • Having to assess whether a falling market is within the scope of the particular duty of care affords the judge an effective check.

Quantifying the recovery under a claim for economic loss following breach of a duty of care in tort is difficult. The breach can push the victim into a set of dramatic consequences.

In resolving such claims, judges have two roles. The first is to establish a dividing line on the facts; and the second, for higher courts, is to set out a workable principle for future reference. Courts can address a victim’s financial recovery in terms of a combination of arguments over the scope of the duty, causation, remoteness and (sometimes) contributory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll