header-logo header-logo

Making a success of Brexit

21 October 2016 / Andrew Eaton , Charles Brasted
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Features , Public , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7719_brasted

How can the “conscious uncoupling” of the EU & UK legal systems be achieved, ask Charles Brasted & Andrew Eaton

  • Brexit poses fundamental questions for the UK’s unwritten constitution & legislative framework.

Constitutional law has so far been central to the public debate on the implications of the EU referendum result.

One constitutional issue that has received much attention is the, now infamous, Art 50 debate. Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which is the legal mechanism for a member state to leave the EU, provides that it is for the UK to “decide” to leave the EU “in accordance with its own constitutional requirements” and to notify the European Council of its decision. Early rumours that the prime minister might trigger it accidentally or that the EU might force the UK to give notice immediately have been dispelled. The question remains: what are those constitutional requirements and who is entitled to make the decision?

The government has maintained that it is entitled to trigger

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll