header-logo header-logo

Making it all add up

10 October 2013 / John O'Hare
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

John O'Hare provides practical advice on revising a costs management budget

Costs management budgets are not costs caps; the court will expect the parties to regularly review them and to either agree, or apply for, revisions when necessary. It is most unlikely that anyone will be able to predict all the significant developments which will later occur in the course of a case, however carefully they drafted the first budget. Practice Direction 3E, para 2.6 refers to the making of revisions (upwards or downwards) if significant developments warrant them using words of obligation: “Each party shall revise its budget.”

Revisions are likely to be agreed or allowed whenever it becomes clear that any of the assumptions listed on the first page of the budget is false. Similarly, every budget is subject to certain implied assumptions (that opponents will not serve unnecessarily prolix pleadings or witness statements, or be uncooperative as to site inspections or inspection of documents). When setting your first budget

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll