header-logo header-logo

05 February 2016 / Camilla Fusco
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Making contact work

Camilla Fusco provides guidance for putting in place successful contact arrangements

Most family law practitioners will have experience of making applications for child arrangement orders (CAOs) which regulate the arrangements concerning whom a child will spend time with and when (formerly contact). However, advising clients about the most effective remedies for enforcement of such orders (referred to here as “contact orders”) can be far more difficult. This article examines the powers and sanctions available to the court in contact cases.

Background

The family courts have faced criticism from some as being slow to enforce court orders in child contact cases. Often the concern for judges (and clients) is that the enforcement route may increase the level of conflict and impact adversely on the child. A report published in December 2013 by Exeter University entitled Enforcing contact orders—problem-solving or punishment? (Liz Trinder, Joan Hunt, Alison Macleod, Julia Pearce, Hilary Woodward) analysed a nationally representative sample of 215 enforcement applications and reached some interesting conclusions:

  1. Although the public perception is that enforcement problems stem from implacably hostile mothers
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll