header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Making a connection

Smith has forced the courts to re-evaluate the concept of control,says Brent McDonald

In Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2009] UKHL 27, ALL ER [2009] All ER (D) 170 (May) Mrs Smith was a carer and driver working for the defendant. On the day of her accident, as she had done for eight years previously, she attended at a private house to convey the occupant, who was a wheelchair user, into the minibus. To do so she had to wheel the claimant down a wooden ramp which had been installed at the client’s home by the NHS.

Although the council had carried out an inspection of the ramp (which, it was agreed, would not have revealed a defect) and asked Mrs Smith to visually inspect the ramp before using it, they had no right to call for its removal, to repair it or otherwise exercise control over it.

Due to rotting which could not be seen, the edge of the ramp gave way as the claimant crossed it, causing the claimant to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll