header-logo header-logo

LSLA president welcomes new dawn for disclosure

09 August 2018
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Legal News , E-disclosure
printer mail-detail
julian_acratopulo

A two-year disclosure pilot scheme which will introduce a new set of disclosure rules in the Business and Property Courts has been welcomed by Julian Acratopulo, president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA). Under the new regime, ‘Disclosure Duties’ will bind the parties, including the duty not to inundate the other side with a host of irrelevant documents. Acratopulo, pictured, says the reforms will introduce ‘greater flexibility’ to the process. Writing in this week’s issue, Acratopulo says that for the pilot scheme to work, practitioners must embrace the opportunity to approach disclosure differently. He adds that the prospect of increasing competition from overseas partly in response to Brexit serves to ‘put a premium on the pace of change’.

Issue: 7805 / Categories: Legal News , E-disclosure
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll