header-logo header-logo

LSC crime packs published

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Application packs for the new general criminal contract (GCC), which will apply to legal aid firms across England and Wales from next year, have been published by the Legal Services Commission (LSC).

Any providers—including current GCC contract holders—who want to carry out new criminal legal aid work from 14 January 2008 must apply.
The LSC says there will be no surprises in the new GCC, claiming it has consulted on everything in it “other than the necessary changes to take account of legal developments”. The amendment clauses, it says, reflect its understanding of the law following Mr Justice Beatson’s judgment on the unified contract in R (on the application of the Law Society) v Legal Services Commission.

Rodney Warren, director of the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association, urges all criminal law solicitors to read the documentation thoroughly.
He says: “No one will want to sign any documentation until the content and, much more importantly, the ramification of the contract and system changes are thoroughly understood.

“The CLSA is arranging a series of regional meetings…and there is to be a national meeting on 23 October at Central Hall, Westminster. This meeting is sure to be a very important milestone. We would urge all criminal lawyers to attend.”

The main difference in the new contract is the way firms will be paid for police station work. The fixed fee level has been set by area, so that in areas outside the main cities an average provider with an average caseload will receive the same income as it does now.

The January 2008 contract reflects the current position on magistrates’ court fees after the amendments made to the fee structures in April 2007. Other changes include: expansion of the defence solicitor call centre to own client work; expansion of Criminal Defence Service (CDS) Direct to those elements of own client work suitable for telephone-only advice; and the introduction of the very high cost case contracting panel to run for 18 months. Crown court criminal aid fees are expected to be published next week.

The LSC believes most criminal legal aid providers will sign the contracts and that it will have sufficient firms to deliver the CDS.

Derek Hill, CDS director, says: “As with the unified contract earlier this year when 95% of existing civil legal aid providers signed, we expect that most firms will see it as in their interest to sign, as well as in the interest of their clients.”

 

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll