header-logo header-logo

11 June 2025
Issue: 8120 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Low morale in magistrates’ courts

Magistrates are resigning from office due to poor working conditions and lack of support and recognition, the Magistrates Association (MA) has warned

In a report published last week, 'Magistrates matter: a plan to ensure magistrates are valued, appreciated and recognised', the MA details its members’ experiences. All unpaid volunteers, they face a lengthy appointments process—sometimes up to two years—report ‘haphazard’ IT training, face frequent last-minute cancellations, cold court buildings and often encounter delays when reclaiming expenses

Mark Beattie JP, national chair of the MA, said volunteer magistrates handle more than 90% of all criminal cases and ‘without them, the system would grind to a halt.

‘However, magistrates are disregarded, neglected, undervalued and often out-of-pocket. While their overwhelming motivation for performing the role is to contribute to their community, and many have been happy to do so despite the lack of appreciation, a lack of support, financial strain, time pressures and insufficient recognition all make volunteering as a magistrate increasingly difficult.’

‘The government has said that, with the current strain in the justice system, magistrate numbers must increase—and sharply—from the current 14,000 to over 20,000,’ Beattie said. ‘However, the hidden costs of service outlined in our report are making it harder to recruit and retain magistrates, particularly from underrepresented groups, such as people from lower socio-economic backgrounds, those aged under 35, people with school-age children, or caring commitments to elderly and/or disabled relatives, and people in full-time employment.’

The report makes seven recommendations, including properly recording volunteering hours, holding recognition events led by Lord-Lieutenants, introducing a ten-year long-service medal and creating a volunteer charter codifying rights and responsibilities.

The MA also calls for a Magistrates’ Attitude Survey similar to the Judicial Attitude Survey, structured opportunities for feedback and a ‘multi-year recruitment and retention strategy’ with targets, long-term forecasting and career development pathways. 
Issue: 8120 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll