header-logo header-logo

12 January 2017 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

A low benchmark?

nlj_7729_jack

Judicial recruitment is in crisis, says Adrian Jack

A shocking shortfall in recruitment to the High Court and circuit benches is revealed in the latest submissions of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) to the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB). Of 14 vacancies in High Court in the most recent competition, only eight could be filled. Of 55 vacancies for circuit judges, only 44 appointments could be made. Further, in 2015 the SSRB noted that the number of “outstanding” candidates for the High Court was dropping.

In that year, for the first time, the JAC was unable to find even a “selectable” candidate to fill a Family Division vacancy, let alone an “outstanding” or “strong” applicant. The 2016 High Court competition was much worse. Only six out of ten vacancies in the Queen’s Bench Division and one out of three in the Family Division could be filled. The one post in the Chancery Division was filled. Moreover, there were only 56 applications in 2016, as against 73 (for fewer vacancies) in 2015.

Quality assessment

Further it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll