header-logo header-logo

09 May 2013
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

At a loss over new PI rule

Proportionality rule is “boggling” says personal injury expert

There was such a “frenzy of activity” among lawyers before the 1 April cut-off date for the new civil litigation rules that one after-the-event (ATE) insurer sold £30m of policies in March alone.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Patrick Allen, senior partner of Hodge, Jones and Allen, says the insurer’s normal annual turnover was £1m.

Allen, who sits as a deputy district judge and is a former president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says civil litigation lawyers do not have the “faintest idea” how the new rule on proportionality will work because there is “no guidance”. He said satellite litigation was “inevitable”. “The concept that necessary and reasonable work done (required by the defendant or the court) may now be unrecoverable is still boggling. There will be retrospective effects caused by the transitional rule. For example what about success fees which are not supposed to be taken into account for proportionality under the old rule?”

Allen says the “losers” from the referral fee ban will be consumers who now have less choice, and those “smaller firms” which are no longer on panels, able to buy work from claims management companies or afford internet marketing.

Referring to the changes to the road traffic accident (RTA) portal, he warns that lawyers will have to run portal claims as “loss leaders” in future, even if there is a contribution to costs from damages.

Allen adds that he was concenerd that there would be no effective funding for conditional fee agreements outside personal injury work but says that after the event policies are starting to emerge to cover professional negligence, disrepair, actions against the police and general litigation. He predicts that it will be 12 months before personal injury lawyers will be in a position to judge whether they should “adapt and persevere or leave the market”.

Issue: 7559 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll