header-logo header-logo

07 October 2016 / Trevor Tayleur
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

A losing vote?

nlj_7717_tayleur

Trevor Tayleur discusses Brexit & the loss of rights

  • EU law provides a range of remedies where individuals have suffered loss owing to the UK government’s failure to implement directives correctly.
  • It is very probable that much UK legislation implementing directives will remain in force post-Brexit. However, Brexit may result in individuals losing some significant rights even if the wording of the UK legislation remains unchanged.

Untangling the UK’s legal systems from the EU legal system is one of the major tasks that the UK will face as part of leaving the EU. While there is disagreement about how much domestic law is derived from EU law, undoubtedly in many important fields EU law exerts considerable influence.

Upon the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, EU law will cease to apply in the UK. Art 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union provides that the EU treaties shall cease to apply to the withdrawing state from the date of withdrawal, while domestically prior to withdrawal the UK Parliament will repeal the European Communities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll