header-logo header-logo

19 September 2025 / William Raven
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail

Lord Neuberger on assisted dying

230092
The judge & former president of the Supreme Court talks to William Raven about his views on the Terminally Ill Adults Bill

Lord Neuberger, by his own admission, has ‘for many years been interested in the topic of assisted dying’. Liberalising the law on assisted dying is a question he has often considered—as a law lord in R (on the application of Purdy) v DPP [2009] UKHL 45, [2009] 4 All ER 1147, and in the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38, [2014] 3 All ER 843. When we met on a late-June morning, a few days after the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed its third reading in the House of Commons, it was an issue I was keen to raise. 

Liberalising the law

‘For a long time, I’ve been in favour of liberalising the law,’ Lord Neuberger said. ‘I don’t go to the House of Lords very often, but [in 2021] there was a motion about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll