header-logo header-logo

Lord Chief Justice speaks out on career planning for judges

02 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges are unlikely to hear the outcome of a review into their salaries until “into 2018”, the Lord Chief Justice has said.

Speaking at his annual press conference last week, Lord Thomas also backed more high-level career progression in the judiciary, including appraisal and career planning.

He said he doubted whether the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) would report “until into 2018”.

“What we are looking for is an interim measure and then a proper examination,” he said.

“The last review which took place in 2011 was never implemented and this time I think there is a much greater all round, and I am very grateful to the chairman of the SSRB for this, he feels that really we must do a proper job and then do everything possible to implement the recommendations.”

On career progression, he noted that people are entering the judiciary in their late thirties and therefore the judiciary needed to explore what those people were interested in, “absolutely introduce appraisal” and introduce “some idea of career planning”.

“I am very anxious to make certain that whatever age, but particularly the young when they enter the judiciary, can see a variety of work,” he said.

“They may have started in a tribunal or started as a district judge and they may want to do different things and I think we ought to make that possible.”

Lord Thomas struck a cautious note on the danger of paid McKenzie Friends “preying on vulnerable people”.

“One has to bear in mind, and I have seen this both in crime and in immigration, that someone who is under threat of removal or is accused of a serious crime is extremely vulnerable and it is very easy for someone to say, ‘Come on, I can help you,’” he said.

“I have seen them [helping in immigration cases], who give legal advice that is simply wrong and you are preying on vulnerable people and that is why I am very, very cautious about payment to non-lawyers who try and assist vulnerable people. There is a real risk of exploitation or of giving advice the person wants to hear, not advice that they do not want to hear.”

Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll