header-logo header-logo

Looking ahead to Brexit II

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Future relationship will be even more complex than divorce

The government should avoid drawing red lines but should set out clear objectives ahead of the next phase of Brexit negotiations, a thinktank report has advised.

The UK must use the Art 50 extension to focus on its long-term relationship with the EU, according to the Institute for Government report, Negotiating Brexit: Preparing for talks on the UK’s future relationship with the EU, published this week.

Tim Durrant, lead author, said: ‘Negotiations on our future relationship with the EU will be much more complex than the divorce.

‘They will also set the context for the UK’s relationship with other countries for decades to come. It is vital that the government uses the next months to develop a better understanding of how the EU will approach the next phase.’

The report looks at what went right and what went wrong in negotiations so far, concluding that the main problems were political: Cabinet could not agree on the shape of the future economic relationship, and politicians, particularly on the government backbenches, did not trust the UK’s official negotiators.

It describes the decision to create a dedicated Brexit department, DExEU, ‘misguided’ as it caused tensions with No10. Moreover, the government engaged Parliament late, alienated the devolved governments, and failed to make use of external expertise. Meanwhile, its ‘divide and rule’ diplomatic strategy meant member states rallied behind the European Commission negotiators.

For the next phase of negotiations, the institute recommends that the prime minister appoint a ministerial deputy in the Cabinet Office to oversee the day-to-day negotiations, taking that role away from DExEU. It suggests the government make better use of the Department for International Trade, engage Parliament and the devolved administrations early and consistently, allow more outside input into its plans, and rethink its approach to engaging member states.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll