header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Tom Pangbourne , Julian Miller
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Tax , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Look both ways

Julian Miller & Tom Pangbourne assess the dangers of tax avoidance schemes

Claims against professional advisers in relation to their role in tax avoidance schemes are on the increase. This article examines the basis of such schemes, and why solicitors, barristers and other professionals involved in their implementation may be at risk.

Capital allowances tax reliefs

A number of capital allowance tax reliefs were introduced by the Labour government after 1997 which were designed to encourage investment in particular areas of British industry. This included investment in British films (under s 48 of the Finance (No 2) Act 1998), in technology start-ups (under
s 45 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001) and in research and development (under s 437 Capital Allowances Act 2001). Despite best intentions, inevitably this attracted not just those wishing to invest in the relevant sector but also high net worth individuals seeking to utilise the tax reliefs without any real interest in the underlying asset. This artificiality led to increased scrutiny by HMRC, the gradual restriction of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll