header-logo header-logo

22 March 2023
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Longer sentences for domestic abuse murderers

Ministers are planning to bring in tougher sentences for murder where it is preceded by domestic abuse.

Under the plans, published last week, a history of coercive or controlling behaviour against the victim or the use of excessive or gratuitous violence would become an aggravating factor in sentencing decisions. The Ministry of Justice will launch a public consultation in the summer on whether a higher sentencing starting point of 25 years should apply to such cases, bringing them in line with murders where a knife has been taken to the scene with intent.

The plans follow the recommendations of Clare Wade KC, who chaired the Domestic Homicide Sentence Review, which was commissioned in 2021 following the murders of Ellie Gould and Poppy Devey-Waterhouse. Wade’s review found the current sentencing framework does not adequately reflect that many domestic homicides are preceded by years of abuse.

Justice minister Edward Argar said: ‘Julie Devey and Carole Gould have campaigned bravely and tirelessly after the awful killing of their daughters, Poppy and Ellie, and the government is determined to see an end to murders and violence by abusive partners.

‘No one should ever feel unsafe in their own home, and we will continue working with Julie and Carole and others to make further progress in tackling the dreadful crime of domestic abuse.’

The Sentencing Council has a statutory duty to consider proposals made by the Lord Chancellor on guidelines.

About one in four (26%) homicides in England and Wales are committed by a current or former partner or relative. Of the murder cases reviewed by Wade, 51% involved controlling or coercive behaviour while excessive violence, or overkill, was identified in 60%, with men being the perpetrator in all but one case.

The government has also asked the Sentencing Council to review the manslaughter sentencing guidelines with a view to introducing longer sentences where the defendant alleges ‘rough sex’ was involved.

Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll