header-logo header-logo

Long past its sell-by date?

21 October 2010 / Laura Shirley
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Laura Shirley reports on how the SRA intends to overhaul the CPD treadmill

For many busy solicitors, CPD can too often be seen as little more than a tick box exercise—something that has to be done to remain eligible to practise. But such an approach fails to realise the potential of CPD to maintain and enhance the competence, performance and ethical conduct of solicitors, and to assist solicitors in progressing their careers.

The current compulsory scheme was introduced in 1985 and only minor amendments have been made since its introduction. The main benefit of the scheme has always been its flexibility:

  • Only 25% of the requirement must be met through participation in accredited courses.
  • The remainder may be met through a wide range of other activities including writing articles, participating in informal mentoring sessions, research relating to legal topics, and watching DVDs or webcasts.

Other than the mandatory management course that solicitors attend within the first three years following admission, and specific requirements for higher court advocates, we do not specify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll