header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A long history

backpage_3

As the Modern Slavery Bill passes through Parliament, Geoffrey Bindman QC recalls early abolition struggles

The Modern Slavery Bill, now slowly progressing through Parliament, aims to strengthen the sanctions against a worldwide scourge. It prompts reflection on the deep roots of slavery in our legal history. As the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta draws near we need to be reminded of one feature of this cornerstone of our liberties which is often overlooked. It protected only “free men”.

Stratified society

Thirteenth century England was a highly stratified society. Magna Carta was negotiated between the small landowning elite—the Barons—and the King. For the time its scope was relatively enlightened. “Free men” included some of the lower orders—knights and other gentry. But “villeins”—little better than slaves—were excluded. Villeins were bound to work for their Lord and could not move away from his land without his consent. By the 17th century villeinage had virtually disappeared. Yet the lawfulness of slavery and the lucrative slave trade remained in dispute for much longer.

We are all

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll