header-logo header-logo

13 November 2024
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Long-awaited reforms on mental health

Lawyers have welcomed the Mental Health Bill, which modernises the law regarding detention and compulsory treatment

The Bill, which was introduced in the House of Lords last week, will reform the Mental Health Act 1983—found to be outdated by a 2018 independent review conducted by Professor Sir Simon Wessely.

The review identified rising rates of detention, racial disparities in detention and treatment orders, poor patient experience and disadvantages felt by people with a learning disability and autistic people.

According to the government, the Bill aims to give people greater choice and autonomy over their treatment, will end the use of police cells to detain someone experiencing a mental health crisis, and will require clinicians to review a patient’s treatment more frequently. It clarifies that individuals should only be detained if their condition means they are a risk of serious harm to themselves or others, and treatment in detention has a reasonable prospect of helping them.

Families and friends will be given more opportunities to contribute to decisions about treatment. The government also says it wants to limit the length of time people with a learning disability and autistic people can be detained under the Act if they do not have a co-occurring mental health condition that needs hospital treatment and have not committed a criminal offence.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘We are pleased it protects patients from inappropriate detention and provides them with enough involvement and support in decisions about their care.

‘We hope the Bill will give mental health patients access to justice, dignity and the respect they deserve. In the previous parliament, we had worked closely with the joint committee on the draft Mental Health Bill. We will continue to scrutinise the newly published Bill to ensure that it provides agency to individuals.’

The Bill is due to have its second reading at the end of this month.

Issue: 8094 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll