header-logo header-logo

05 August 2022
Issue: 7990 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

London legal salaries rocket

A booming jobs market has sent City salaries soaring, recruiters report

Recruitment firm JMC Legal and market data analysts Vacancysoft reported last week that 40% of UK lawyer vacancies are in London, with in-house the fastest growing source of vacancies (58% of vacancies in London in 2022, with tech companies accounting for 29% of these).

Salaries have also jumped, as City firms compete for talent amid a shortage of qualified lawyers. US law firms are now offering 50% above Magic Circle firms in some cases, partly because sterling is low in comparison to the US dollar. In July, for example, Akin Gump raised its salary for newly qualified lawyers to a stonking £179,000. London-headquartered firms have also boosted pay, for example, McFarlanes is reported to have raised its newly qualified salaries this month to £107,500, having pushed them 11% to £100,000 last November. At the other end of the scale, profit per equity partner topped £2m at Magic Circle firms Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Clifford Chance for the first time this year.

Recruiter Robert Walters found 85% of law firms in London are recruiting, with more jobs posted in the first half of 2022 than in the whole of 2020. Moreover, nearly all firms (93%) have no plans to cut headcount.

Tax specialists are the most sought-after lawyers, followed by real estate and M&A.

Richard Harris, chief legal officer at Robert Walters Group, said: ‘What we encounter during a downturn is a cut back in new trainees, but when demand increases this means there are simply less available qualified lawyers at the junior end of the profession, putting pressure on the system as a whole.

‘Add in truly incredible wage inflation, greater specialism making some types of lawyer scarce, the increasing scale of in-house teams―partly in response to the increasing rates of law firms which funds the wage inflation―and we have a ticking timebomb of pressure.’
Issue: 7990 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll